Search Conditions

Search Results

The Ombudsman found that the City of Greater Sudbury did not contravene the open meeting requirements during meetings on October 3 and 12, November 9 and December 14, 2011, during which a personal matter related to an identifiable individual was discussed. However, he did str...
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2012/city-of-greater-sudbury
The Ombudsman found that the City of London did not contravene the open meeting requirements when six members of council met for lunch at a local restaurant on February 21, 2012, prior to a budget meeting and several committee meetings.
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2012/city-of-london-en
The Ombudsman found that the Waterfront Improvement Committee for the Township of Billings was a committee of council, as described by the Township's procedure by-law. Although the Committee was already holding open meetings, the Ombudsman encouraged the Township to formalize...
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2014/township-of-billings-on-the-waterfront
The Ombudsman found that a gathering of councillors at a local wharf on April 25, 2014, was a meeting of council for the purpose of the open meeting requirements, and that this meeting was not closed to the public in violation of the open meeting requirements.
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2014/municipality-of-killarney-at-the-wharf”
The Ombudsman found that a July 2, 2014 gathering of three members of council for the City of Elliot Lake at a Sustainable Development Roundtable did not constitute a meeting for the purpose of the open meeting requirements.
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2014/city-of-elliot-lake-around-the-table
The Ombudsman found that council for the City of Thorold did not contravene the Municipal Act during individual discussions held between November 3 and November 28, 2014.
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2015/city-of-thorold
The Ombudsman found that council for the Town of Cochrane did not violate the Municipal Act when it closed part of its January 27, 2015 meeting under the "advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege" exception.
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2015/town-of-cochrane-en
The Ombudsman found that the discussions held by council for McMurrich-Monteith fit within the exceptions in the Municipal Act . The Ombudsman found that the township violated section 239(4)(a) of the Act by failing to state by resolution the general nature of the topics to ...
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2015/township-of-mcmurrich-monteith
The Ombudsman received four complaints about a meeting held by council for the City of Oshawa on December 17, 2015. Each complaint alleged that council’s meeting with the Oshawa Power and Utilities Corporation on that date did not come within the Municipal Act’s closed meet...
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2016/city-of-oshawa
The Ombudsman received a complaint that council for the Township of Alfred and Plantagenet had held illegal closed meetings in 2016 to discuss an organizational study of the municipality. The complaint also alleged that council improperly voted by email to approve funding r...
/resources/reports,-cases-and-submissions/municipal-meetings/2017/township-of-alfred-and-plantagenet